APPLICATION OF DEEP LEARNING PEDAGOGY IN TEACHING “DESIGN CONCEPT MAKING AND COMMUNICATION” IN THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ERA

Authors

  • Thanh Lam Le Faculty of Interior Architecture, University of Architecture Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/24246778.2025.9205

Keywords:

deep learning pedagogy, interior architecture education, design concept development, collaborative learning, critical thinking, digital pedagogy

Abstract

This study examines the application of deep learning pedagogy in teaching the course Design Concept Making and Communication to third-year interior architecture students in the digital transformation era. Instead of referring to artificial intelligence, “deep learning” here denotes a pedagogical approach for fostering deep, meaningful understanding (as opposed to surface-level learning). A four-layer instructional model was implemented: (1) using open-ended questions to spark curiosity and critical thinking, (2) collaborative analysis of real-world case studies (including international award-winning design projects), (3) a peer-to-peer simulated project with inter-group critique (students alternating roles as “client” and “designer”), and (4) a guest lecture by an industry expert to connect classroom learning with professional practice. This layered approach emphasizes active learning, collaboration, and real-world engagement, aligning with modern education goals that prioritize critical thinking, creativity, communication, and collaboration skills. To evaluate the intervention's effectiveness, a mixed-method approach was conducted, utilizing anonymous student feedback surveys, continuous qualitative classroom observations, and the evaluation of student work artifacts. Results indicate that the deep learning pedagogy significantly enhanced student engagement, critical thinking, and design concept development. Students reported that analyzing real cases and engaging in role-play critique notably improved their ability to generate and communicate design ideas, while also valuing expert insights that linked their work to industry expectations. While challenges such as initial student discomfort with open-ended tasks and the need for careful facilitation were noted, the overall reception was highly positive. The findings suggest that a structured deep learning pedagogy can be a valuable enhancement to interior design education, complementing traditional studio methods and providing a scalable framework to better prepare students for the complex, collaborative demands of the digital transformation era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670

Chen, J., & Singh, C. K. S. (2024). A systematic review on deep learning in education: Concepts, factors, models and measurements. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 7(1), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.54097/gzk2yd38

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep Learning: Engage the World Change the World. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Kahraman, M. E., Ulusoy, M., & Dorzdadeh, J. (2024). Integrating AI as a creative design tool in interior design education: An experimental studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09826-5

Lam, L. T. (2023). Application of Connectivism Theory in teaching the course “Design Concept Making and Communication” in the digital transformation era. [Paper presentation], WORLD YOUTH STUDIES CONGRESS-IV- PROCEEDINGS BOOK, 42-45.

Lam, L. T. (2024). Student survey results for the “Design Concept Making and Communication” course [Unpublished raw data]. Department of Interior Architecture, University of Architecture Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I – Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x

Wang, T. (2010). “Peer critique” in studio: A pedagogic methodology for developing design thinking and communication skills. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01647.x

Weng, C., Chen, C., & Ai, X. (2023). A pedagogical study on promoting students’ deep learning through design-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(4), 1653–1674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09789-4

Zeiser, K. L., Yang, J., Bitter, C., & Shaat, D. (2022). The Study of Deeper Learning: College enrollment, persistence, and degree completion in the first 6 years after high school. American Institutes for Research (AIR). Retrieved from https://www.air.org/resource/report/study-deeper-learning-college-enrollment-persistence-and-degree-completion-first-6-years

Downloads

Published

2026-05-28

How to Cite

APPLICATION OF DEEP LEARNING PEDAGOGY IN TEACHING “DESIGN CONCEPT MAKING AND COMMUNICATION” IN THE DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ERA. (2026). Proceedings of the World Conference on Media and Mass Communication, 9(2), 72-92. https://doi.org/10.17501/24246778.2025.9205