INVESTIGATING THE INTEGRATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE SENIOR PHASE IN SOUTH AFRICAN TECHNICAL SCHOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2026.12106Keywords:
Teaching and learning,, Digital technologies,, Technology Acceptance Model,, Technology Learning AreaAbstract
Throughout the history of teaching and learning, changes such as the use of calculators and computers have been recorded to be opposed before most teachers could be comfortable with such change. The Department of Basic Education has drafted a policy for implementing current technologies in schools as part of the Technology Learning Area (TLA). This study seeks to explore the extent to which schools have adopted and integrated current technologies in the Senior Phase. The study is guided by the technology acceptance model (TAM) to assist in investigating the extent of integrating current technologies in technical schools. TAM enabled the researchers to identify the factors influencing the acceptance and use of these technologies in schools. A qualitative study was conducted to derive what the literature and school educators are saying about the phenomenon under inquiry. Data was gathered through interviews with the educators and classroom observations. Content analysis was employed to analyse the qualitative data. The results have revealed that the extent to which teachers implement new technologies in the classroom teaching and learning context is dependent on the availability of resources and skills. The participants indicated the use of overhead projectors as a prominent technology they use for teaching and learning. Furthermore, the participants stated that the Department of Basic Education does not provide in-service training regularly to upskill educators in relevant software and applications relevant to their subjects. It could therefore be concluded that educators need ongoing in-service training to keep up with the evolving technologies. The Department of Basic Education may partner with the institutions of higher education to assist with ongoing training for educators on new technologies.
References
Alam, M. (2018). Digital Technologies in Teaching and Learning. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 6(2), pp. 34-39. DOI: 10.25215/0602.045
Alharahsheh, H.H., & Pius, A. (2020). A review of key paradigms: Positivism vs interpretivism. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 39-43. DOI: 10.36348/gajhss.2020.v02i03.001
Bekeke, T.A., & Menchaca, M.P. (2008). Research on internet-supported learning: A review. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(4), 373-405. ISSN: 1528-5319
Blose, P. and Ndlovu, E.C. (2023). An Investigation on Factors Affecting the Teaching of Practical Assessment Tasks in the Senior Phase Technology Classrooms. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 8(4), pp.345-359.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brink, R. (2018). A multiple case design for the investigation of information management processes for work-integrated learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, Special Issue, 19(3), 223-235.
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Ertmer, P.A., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E. & Woods, D. (1999). Examining Teachers' Beliefs about the Role of Technology in the Elementary Classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54-72.
Fodouop Kouam, A.W. 2014. Interpretivism or Constructivism: Navigating Research Paradigms in Social Science Research. International Journal of Research Publication, 143(1), 1-5. DOI: 1001431220246122
Halkias, D., Neubert, M., & Harkiolakis, N. (2023). Multiple Case Study Data Analysis for Doctoral Researchers in Management and Leadership (April 19,2023). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4423757 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4423757 [accessed 11-03-2026).
Howard, S. K. & Mozejko, A. (2015). Considering the history of digital technologies in education. In M. Henderson, M., & G. Romero (Eds.), Teaching and Digital Technologies: Big Issues and Critical Questions (pp. 157-168). Port Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Julianto, P., Yasa, N.P., & Devi, S. (2019). The analysis of technology acceptance model (TAM) on the use of accounting information system. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 69 (1), 276-280. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Tourism, Economics, Accounting, Management, and Social Science (TEAMS 2018).
Kearns, L.R. (2012). Student assessment in online learning: Challenges and effective practices. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 198-208.
Koehler, M. and Mishra, P., 2009. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), .60-70.
Kozma, R.B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of research on technology in education, 36(1), 1-14.
Lazebna, N., & Prykhodko, A. (2021). Digital discourse of English language acquisition. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 971-982. Doi: 10.52462/jlls.67
Lochmiller, C.R. (2021). Conducting thematic analysis with qualitative data. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2029-2044. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008
Lohr, A., Sailer, M., Stadler, M., & Fischer, F. (2024). Digital learning in schools: Which skills do teachers need, and who should bring their own devices? Teaching and Teacher Education, 152(1), 1-12. DOI: 104788
Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K.M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. 2005. Qualitative research methods: A data collector’s field guide. Family Health International, USA.
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (AISHE- J), 3(1), 3351-33514. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335
Majdoub, M., Heilporn, G., & Diab, F. (2024). Digital Technology Use in High School Classes: Linking Types of Access and Student Engagement. Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal, 4(3), 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2024.4.3.75
Maikyan, D., & Papagiannidis, S. (2024). Thirty-five years of the technology acceptance model: Insights from meta-analysis structural equation modelling. Technology in Education Society and Scholarship Association Journal, 4(3), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2024.4.3.66
Mashile, T. Z. (2016). Technology integration and the digital divide: Understanding factors that impact on educators’ ability to integrate technology in South African classrooms.
McCoy, S., & Siedschlag, L. (2025). Digital skills and the impact of digital technologies in secondary education in the era of artificial intelligence. Economic and Social Research Institute – Unpublished.
Musood, T., & Kaur, B. (2025). Digital competence and attitudes toward AI: Mindful attention awareness as a mediator. IAFOR Journal of Education: Technology in Education, 13(2), 113-133. ISSN:2187- 0594
Natasia, S.R., Wiranti, Y.T., & Parastika, A. (2022). Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the technology acceptance model (TAM) approach. Procedia Computer Science, 197(2022), 512-520. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.168
Pervin, N., & Mokhtar, M. (2022). The Interpretivist Research Paradigm: A Subjective Notion of a Social Context. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(2), 419–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i2/12938
Phunyal, B. (2023). Adaptation of Digital Technologies in Secondary Level Education for Teaching English. GS Sparks:Journal of Applied Academic Discourse, 1(1), pp. 67-74. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8372165
Resnick, L.B. and Schantz, F. (2017). Testing, teaching, learning: who is in charge? Assessment in Education. Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), pp.424-432.
Sarkar, B. (2023). Digital technology in education for the teaching and learning process of 21st century. In Baskey et al. (Eds), Educational Technology: 21st Century. Sweden (pp 87-94). Red’ Shine Publication. DOI: 10.25215/9189764617
Sharlovych, Z., Vilchynska, L., Danylyuk, S., Huba, B., & Zadilska, H. (2023). Digital Technologies as a Means of Improving the Efficiency of Higher Education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(8), pp. 1214-1221. DOI: 10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.8.1923
Scherer, S., & Brito, G. da S. (2020). Digital Technologies Integration in School Curriculum: Dialogue about Challenges and Difficulties. Digital Culture and Education, 36(e76252), pp. 1-22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-4060.76252
Schorr, A. (2023). The technology acceptance model (tam) and its importance for digitalization research: A review. Technikpsychologie 1(1), 55-65. DOI: 10.2478/9788366675896-005
Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S.V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A.M. and Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and information technologies, 28(6), pp.6695-6726.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Voogt, J. and Roblin, N.P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), pp.299-321.
Yin, R.K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish, 2nd Ed. The Guilford Press, USA.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Charles Masoabi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
