STEM TEACHING: PERCEPTION, CHALLENGES AND SELF EFFICACY AMONG IN-SERVICE TEACHERS

Authors

  • Balvinder Kaur HELP University, Subang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2026.12110

Keywords:

21st century skills, science, technology, STEM education

Abstract

STEM education plays a significant role in today’s accelerating century in diverse sectors. This study aims to investigate the perceptions, challenges, and self-efficacy of the in-service teachers in implementing STEM teaching with their students. A mixed-method research design referred to as an explanatory sequential design is used in this study. The questionnaires were directed to 22 in-service teachers in the Klang Valley and Johor who taught STEM subjects to their students. The quantitative findings show that 90.5% of the in- service teachers have the insight that STEM is interesting and hands-on, while 81.0% believe that it encourages creativity. The results further noted that 95.2% of teachers agreed that students enjoyed studying STEM, while 100% of them acknowledged that teachers play an important role in delivering STEM lessons to their students. A mean value of 4.14 revealed that the teachers were satisfied with carrying out the STEM teaching. The challenges faced by the teachers were reported qualitatively through open-ended interview questions, while the focus group interview was conducted to understand teachers’ self- efficacy in carrying out the STEM activities with their students. Thematic analysis by Braun & Clarke was adopted to identify the qualitative themes. It was noted that the teacher faced some challenges, such as space constraints, time constraints, technical challenges and environmental safety challenges. It was explained through the focus group interview that the teachers gained instructional confidence, technological confidence and collaborative confidence. This was supported by the quantitative data, which revealed that 90.5% of the in-service teachers' STEM teaching boosts their knowledge and confidence level, which leads to implementing STEM activities. In conclusion, STEM activities have a positive impact on the mindset of the teachers, notably because of the hands-on and interactive sessions with their students. The study, however, implied that more training sessions are required for STEM activities and lessons by the in-service teachers. Despite having data consistent with the findings, the small and localised sample size limits the generalizability.

References

Abbas, Q., Parveen, K., Rehman, M., Tabassum, S., & Ahmed, D. (2023). Teachers’ perspectives on the benefits and role of stem education in the solution of complex global challenges. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 4(1), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.52223/jess.20234118

Abdul Nasir Kiazai, Naila Siddiqua, & Zarina Waheed. (2020). Challenges in implementing STEM education and role of teacher education programs in mitigating these challenges. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 5(2), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.36261/ijdeel.v5i2.1047

Akiha, K., Brigham, E., Couch, B. A., Lewin, J., Stains, M., Stetzer, M. R., ... & Smith, M. K. (2018, January). What types of instructional shifts do students experience? Investigating active learning in science, technology, engineering, and math classes across key transition points from middle school to the university level. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 2, p. 68). Frontiers Media SA.

Allen, M., Webb, A. W., & Matthews, C. E. (2016). Adaptive teaching in STEM: Characteristics for effectiveness. Theory Into Practice, 55(3), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1173994

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Buechel, C., Daugherty, M. K., Carter, V., & Sahin Topalcengiz, E. (2024). Elementary teachers' self- efficacy and its role in STEM implementation. Turkish Journal of Education, 13(3), 217-238. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.1267839

Bullo, M. M., Leuterio, J. B., Atiga, K. L., Reyes, B. Y., Veloso, J. M. L., Dalimocon, J. C., Dayday, A. K. O., Bersales, K. G., Inhog, J. C. C., Dagohoy, A. J. P., Son, C. T., & Orcales, J. C. (2023). A study of teachers’ perceptions of the factors affecting STEM teaching. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8345044

Calkins, L., Wiens, P., Parker, J., & Tschinkel, R. (2024). Teacher motivation and self-efficacy: How do specific motiva tions for entering teaching relate to teacher self-efficacy? Journal of Education, 204(2), 427-438. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 00220 57422 1142

Dare, E. A., Keratithamkul, K., Hiwatig, B. M., & Li, F. (2021). Beyond content: The role of STEM disciplines, real-world problems, 21st century skills, and STEM careers within science teachers’ conceptions of integrated STEM education. Education Sciences, 11(11),

737. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110737

El-Deghaidy, H., and N. Mansour. 2015.Science Teachers’ Perceptions of STEM Education Possibilities and Challenges. International Journal of Learning and Teaching 1 (1): 51–54.

Gülhan, F., & Şahin, F., (2018). A comparative investigation of middle school 5th and 7th grade students of perceptions on engineers and scientists. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 309-338.

Huang, X., Erduran, S., Luo, K., Zhang, P., & Zheng, M. (2022). Investigating in-service teachers’ STEM literacy: The role of subject background and gender. Research in Science & Technological Education, 42(3), 867-887. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2153243

Ika Liana Khalid, Mohd Nor Syahrir Abdullah, & Hidayah Fadzil. (2025). A Systematic Review: Digital Learning in STEM Education. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 52(2), 48-62.

Ismail, M. H., Hidayah, M. F., Furkan, M. S. M., Rohaida, M. S., Kurniawan, C., &

Hariyono, E. (2024). Investigating Science Teachers’ Instructional Practices: A Need Analysis for Preparing Integrated STEM Practices through Scientist-Teacher-Student Partnership (STSP). Asian Journal of University Education, 20(3), 630–644. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i3.27858

Ismail, M. H., Salleh, M. F., & Nasir, N. A. (2019). The issues and challenges in empowering STEM on science teachers in Malaysian secondary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(13). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i13/6869

Jerrim, J., Sims, S., & Oliver, M. (2023). Teacher self-efficacy and pupil achievement: much ado about nothing? International evidence from TIMSS. Teachers and Teaching, 29(2), 220-240. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 13540 602. 2022. 21593 65

Kavak, Ş. (2023). The evolution and global significance of STEM education in the 21st century. The Journal of Inter national Scientific Researches, 8(3), 410–415. https:// doi. org/ 10. 23834/ isrjo urnal. 13422 55

Lavi, R., Tal, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21st century skills through methods of teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002

Liu, J., Wang, K., & Pan, Z. (2025). The effectiveness of professional development in the self-efficacy of in-service teachers in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1364. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101364

Malaysia, Kementerian Pendidikan. Pelan pembangunan pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. (2013). Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a

systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-

Marzuki, O. F., Lih, E. T., Zainol @ Abdullah, W. N., Khairuddin, N., Inai, N. H., Md Saad, J. B., & Abdul Aziz, M. H. (2024). Innovating education: A comprehensive review of STEM education approaches. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v13-i1/20490

Moore, T.J., Johnston, A.C., & Glancy, A.W. (2020). STEM integration: A synthesis of

conceptual frameworks and definitions. In Johnson, C.C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Moore, T.J., & English, L.D. (Eds.), Handbook of research on STEM education. (3–16) Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429021381-2.

Nipyrakis, A., Stavrou, D., & Avraamidou, L. (2024). In-service teachers’ views about STEM integration. Research in Integrated STEM Education, 2(2), 85-

119. https://doi.org/10.1163/27726673-bja00021

Rezaull Karim, M., Ahmed Masud, N., Nesa Subarna, M. T., Billah, M. M., & Wienaah, P.

(2021). Self-efficacy: A key components of teacher effectiveness. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2021/v25i130590

Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2021). Beyond the basics: A

detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00041-y

Sellami, A., Santhosh, M. E., Michaleczek, I., Alazaizeh, M., & Madad, J. (2024). Unveiling teachers’ instructional self-efficacy in science, mathematics, and technology: Personal and contextual influences. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 24(3-4), 418-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-025-00359-z

Shelley, M., & Kiray, S. A. (2018). RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS IN STEM EDUCATION. ISRES Publishing.

Sirajudin, N., Suratno, J., & Pamuti. (2021). Developing creativity through STEM education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012211. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1806/1/012211

Srikoom, W., Hanuscin, D. L., & Faikhamta, C. (2017). Perceptions of In-Service Teachers toward Teaching STEM in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1179211

Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1.

Stretch, E. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2021). Framing failure: Leveraging uncertainty to launch creativity in STEM education. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.7.2.123-133.

Syafrizal. (2024). The influence of teachers confidence on teaching and learning process in school. JOLADU: Journal of Language Education, 2(3), 150-

159. https://doi.org/10.58738/joladu.v2i3.369

Zhao, J., Wijaya, T. T., Mailizar, M., & Habibi, A. (2022). Factors Influencing Student

Satisfaction toward STEM Education: Exploratory Study Using Structural Equation Modeling. Applied Sciences, 12(19), 9717. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199717

Zhou, X., Shu, L., Xu, Z., & Padrón, Y. (2023). The effect of professional development on in- service STEM teachers’ self-efficacy: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00422-x

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

STEM TEACHING: PERCEPTION, CHALLENGES AND SELF EFFICACY AMONG IN-SERVICE TEACHERS. (2026). Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, 12(01), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2026.12110