TRENDS IN GENETICS EDUCATION RESEARCH IN INDONESIA: ENHANCING GENETIC LITERACY FOR SOCIETY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2025.11106Keywords:
Genetic, Teaching and Learning, Biology Education JournalsAbstract
Genetics is a rapidly growing branch of biology, playing a crucial role across various disciplines, emphasizing the importance of genetic literacy for students. Like other forms of literacy, genetic literacy has emerged as a societal trend, highlighting the need for a foundational understanding of genetics among academics and the general public. However, students often perceive genetics as challenging due to its abstract molecular concepts, making effective teaching strategies essential. This study employed content analysis to analyze articles from Indonesian biology education journals indexed by SINTA from 2013 to 2024, focusing on efforts to enhance the quality and effectiveness of genetics instruction. The analysis reveals a general increase in publication numbers each year, with slight declines in 2017 and 2020. The most common research designs were R&D studies, which produced educational tools such as media, modules, and other instructional resources. Genetic materials, especially at the high school level, were the most frequently researched topic, as they provide essential foundational concepts for understanding biology. Descriptive analysis (percentage) was the most prevalent data analysis method, although it could have been more effective in generalizing findings. Digital media applications emerged as the most popular teaching strategy, reflecting the complexity of genetics, which benefits from visible aids. Recommendations for future research include employing more precise data analysis techniques and further exploration using qualitative or mixed-method approaches for a more comprehensive understanding of genetics instruction.
Downloads
References
Arends, R. I. (2015). Learning How To Teach. In McGraw-Hill Education (Tenth Edit). McGraw-Hill Education.
Bappenas. (2020). Metadata indikator Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan: Pilar Pembangunan Sosial. In Bappenas.
Belva Saskia Permana, Lutvia Ainun Hazizah, & Yusuf Tri Herlambang. (2024). Teknologi Pendidikan: Efektivitas Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Di Era Digitalisasi. Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 4(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v4i1.2702
Bowling, B. V., Acra, E. E., Wang, L., Myers, M. F., Dean, G. E., Markle, G. C., Moskalik, C. L., & Huether, C. A. (2008). Development and evaluation of a genetics literacy assessment instrument for undergraduates. Genetics, 178(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.079533
Buma, A., & Nyamupangedengu, E. (2020). Investigating Teacher Talk Moves in Lessons on Basic Genetics Concepts in a Teacher Education Classroom. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2020.1731647
Campbell, N. A. (2010). Biologi: Jilid 1. Edisi 8 Volume 1 Dari Biologi Cambell Ed.8. Penerbit Erlangga, 568.
Caruth, G. D. (2013). Demystifying Mixed Methods Research Design: A Review of the Literature. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 3(2), 112–122. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.13.35.3.2
Chapman*, R., Likhanov, M., Selita, F., Zakharov, I., Smith-Woolley, E., & Kovas, Y. (2017). Genetic Literacy And Attitudes Survey (Iglas): International Population-Wide Assessment Instrument. December, 45–66. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2017.12.6
Chapman, R., Likhanov, M., Selita, F., Zakharov, I., Smith-Woolley, E., & Kovas, Y. (2019). New literacy challenge for the twenty-first century: genetic knowledge is poor even among well educated. Journal of Community Genetics, 10(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-018-0363-7
Choi, S., Seo, H. J., & Kim, Y. S. (2016). Analysis of the Research Trends of the Korean Journal of Educational Research Using Network Text Analysis. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 10, 169–178. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:1457105
Corebima. 2010. Pendekatan Baru Genetika dari Pendekatan Sejarah ke Pendekatan Konsep. Disajikan pada Seminar Nasional MIPA Universitas Negeri Malang 13 Oktober 2010.
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Education Research : Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. In Pearson Education.
Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students’ understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 938–959. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20186
Fauzi, A., & Fariantika, A. (2018). Courses perceived difficult by undergraduate students majoring in biology. Biosfer, 11(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v11n2.78-89
Fauzi, A., & Pradipta, I. W. (2018). Research Methods and Data Analysis Techniques in Education Articles. Indonesian Biology Educational, 4(2), 123–134.
Freidenreich, H. B., Duncan, R. G., & Shea, N. (2011). Exploring Middle School Students’ Understanding of Three Conceptual Models in Genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 33(17), 2323–2349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.536997
Göktaş, Y., & Tellİ, E. (2012). Educational Technology Research Trends in Turkey : A Content Analysis of the 2000-2009 Decade *. Educational Science: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 191–199.
Jeffery, A. J., Rogers, S. L., Jeffery, K. L. A., & Hobson, L. (2021). A flexible, open, and interactive digital platform to support online and blended experiential learning environments: Thinglink and thin sections. Geoscience Communication, 4(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-95-2021
Kılıç, D., & Sağlam, N. (2014). Students’ understanding of genetics concepts: the effect of reasoning ability and learning approaches. Journal of Biological Education, 48(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.837402
Kılıç Mocan, D. (2021). What do Students Really Understand? Secondary Education Students’ Conceptions of Genetics. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 10(2), 1405–1422. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.21.or061
Klug, W. S., Cumming, M. R., Spencer, C. A., & Palladino, M. A. (1981). Essentials og Genetics. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9).
Knippels, M.-C. P. J., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976
Lanie, A. D., Jayaratne, T. E., Sheldon, J. P., Kardia, S. L. R., Anderson, E. S., Feldbaum, M., & Petty, E. M. (2004). Exploring the Public Understanding of Basic Genetic Concepts. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13(4), 305–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGC.0000035524.66944.6d
Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance - do students see any relationship? International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289949
McMullan, J. (2017). A new understanding of ‘New Media’: Online platforms as digital mediums. Convergence, 26(2), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517738159
Muhazaroh, I. (2023). Pemanfaatan Media Digital Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Di Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(1), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.58705/jpm.v2i1.116
Murray-Nseula, M. (2011). Incorporating case studies into an undergraduate genetics course. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(3), 75–85. http://ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ956746&site=ehost-live
Mustika, A. A., Hala, Y., & Arsal, A. F. (2014). Negeri makassar pada konsep genetika dengan metode CRI identification of misconception of biology students at state university of makassar on genetic concept by applying CRI method. Jurnal Ilmu Ilmiah Peengetahuan Alam, III(2), 122–129.
Nadhiroh, N., Wilujeng, I., Sa’diyah, A., & Erlangga, S. Y. (2021). Smartphone-Based Learning Media on Microscope Topic for High School Students. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 541(Isse 2020), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.060
Nora Repi, C. M., & Kolondam, B. J. (2023). Teaching Strategies for Genetic Diversity: Fostering Inclusive Genetics Education in High Schools. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(12), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20231220
Nusantari, E. (2014). Genetika : belajar Genetika dengan Mudah dan Komprehensif. Deepublish, 156(4), 258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00112-008-1736-5
OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Science Framework. OECD Publishing, 19–48. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-3-en
Parish, J. H. (1985). Modern genetics (Second edition): By F J Ayala and J A Kiger, Jr. pp 923. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park and London. 1984 ISBN 0-8053-0316-2. Biochemical Education, 13(2), 87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0307-4412(85)90027-5
Russell, P. J. (1996). Genetics. Harper Collins College Publishers, 4. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=yxhFAQAAIAAJ
Scholtes, V. A., Terwee, C. B., & Poolman, R. W. (2011). What makes a measurement instrument valid and reliable? Injury, 42(3), 236–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.042
Simmons, M. J., & Snustad, D. P. (2006). Principles of Genetics, 8th Ed. Wiley India, 8, 740. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=33vi549EIIcC
Uzunboylu, H., & Aşıksoy, G. (2014). Research in Physics Education: A Study of Content Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 425–437. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.353
Van Mil, M. H. W., Boerwinkel, D. J., & Waarlo, A. J. (2013). Modelling Molecular Mechanisms: A Framework of Scientific Reasoning to Construct Molecular-Level Explanations for Cellular Behaviour. Science & Education, 22(1), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9379-7
Watikasari, S. U. I. D. (2023). Trend penelitian cedera dalam pendidikan olahraga di Indonesia dari tahun 2014-2021. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 19(2), 17–28.
Zudaire, I., Ayuso, G. E., Napal, M., & Uriz, I. (2024). Who do I Look like More, Mom or Dad? An Exploratory Survey about Primary Students’ Ideas about Heredity. Research in Science Education, 54(6), 1025–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10174-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Soleh, Widi Purwianingsih , Riandi Riandi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
