COMPARATIVE STUDY IN PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS OF PERSONALIZED LEARNING AND TRADITIONAL CURRICULUM IN MEDICAL EDUCATION

Authors

  • Supawit Tangpanithandee Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Thailand
  • Satanat Kitsiranuwat Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Thailand
  • Marut Chantra Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
  • Pongtong Puranitee Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand
  • Nuttanont Hongwarittorrn Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2025.11101

Keywords:

Curriculum Assessment, Machine Learning, Medical Education, Personalized Learning, Predictive Modeling

Abstract

Personalized education, known as Student-Selected Components (SSCs), empowers students to partially design their study plans, allowing for individualized learning experiences. In medical education, SSCs aim to provide self-directed learning, but evaluating student performance within such diverse curricula is challenging. Recently, an SSC-based curriculum was implemented at Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand. This study aims to assess the impact of the SSC curriculum on medical student performance by comparing failure rates on comprehensive exams with those of the traditional curriculum. Additionally, machine learning techniques were developed to identify key factors influencing learning outcomes and to predict the likelihood of fifth-year medical students passing or failing their exams. A dataset of 205 fifth-year medical students, encompassing 20 demographic and academic variables, was analyzed. The hypothesis testing and analysis were conducted by open-source tools including Python and Google Colab. The hypothesis testing result indicated that the SSC-based curriculum exhibited a slightly higher failure rate compared to traditional cohorts; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, Random Forest, Adaptive Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting were employed and tuned with various data-balancing techniques in order to get best results. Those models were evaluated based on F1-score. The SVM model outperformed with the highest F1-score of 84.8%. Key predictors included GPA of pre-clinical years, followed by grades in Neurology, Ophthalmology-Otolaryngology, Pediatrics, and Mother-Baby care. These findings suggest potential challenges in adapting to the increased self-directed nature of the SSC curriculum. Although the predictive models could effectively identify students at risk of failing, enabling targeted early interventions, it could be improved with additional data on student performance metrics. While the SSC curriculum offers greater flexibility and personalization, further refinements are necessary to optimize learning outcomes and ensure consistent quality in medical education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdu, E. (2024). Student Performance Prediction Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, 2024. doi:10.1155/2024/4067721

Adam, J., Bore, M., Childs, R., Dunn, J., McKendree, J., Munro, D., & Powis, D. (2015). Predictors of professional behaviour and academic outcomes in a UK medical school: A longitudinal cohort study. Med Teach, 37(9), 868-880. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009023

Ahmad, F., Ismail, N. H., & Aziz, A. A. (2015). The prediction of students' academic performance using classification data mining techniques. 9, 6415-6426. doi:10.12988/ams.2015.53289

Al-Barrak, M., & Al-Razgan, M. (2016). Predicting Students Final GPA Using Decision Trees: A Case Study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6, 528-533. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.745

Al Shawwa, L., Abulaban, A. A., Abulaban, A. A., Merdad, A., Baghlaf, S., Algethami, A., . . . Balkhoyor, A. (2015). Factors potentially influencing academic performance among medical students. Adv Med Educ Pract, 6, 65-75. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S69304

Alalawi, K., Athauda, R., & Chiong, R. (2023). Contextualizing the current state of research on the use of machine learning for student performance prediction: A systematic literature review. Engineering Reports, 5(12), e12699. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12699

Almarabeh, H. (2017). Analysis of Students' Performance by Using Different Data Mining Classifiers. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 9, 9-15. doi:10.5815/ijmecs.2017.08.02

Anuradha, C., & Thambusamy, V. (2015). A Comparative Analysis on the Evaluation of Classification Algorithms in the Prediction of Students Performance. Indian Journal of Science and technology, 8, 974-6846. doi:10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i15/74555

Asif, R., Merceron, A., Abbas, D.-S., & Haider, N. (2017). Analyzing undergraduate students' performance using educational data mining. Computers & Education, 113. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.007

Asif, R., Merceron, A., & Pathan, M. (2014). Predicting Student Academic Performance at Degree Level: A Case Study. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 7, 49-61. doi:10.5815/ijisa.2015.01.05

Baldi, P., Brunak, S., Chauvin, Y., Andersen, C., & Nielsen, H. (2000). REVIEW Assessing the Accuracy of Prediction Algorithms for Classification: An Overview. Bioinformatics, 16. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/16.5.412

Birihanu, E., & Akmel, F. (2017). Student Performance Prediction Model using Machine Learning Approach: The Case of Wolkite University. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 7, 2277. doi:10.23956/ijarcsse/V7I2/01219

Chango, G., Cerezo, R., & Romero, C. (2021). Multi-source and multimodal data fusion for predicting academic performance in blended learning university courses. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 89, 106908. doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106908

Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence trends in education: a narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16-24. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233

Clark, D. J., Kolias, A. G., Garnett, M. R., Trivedi, R. A., Price, S. J., & Hutchinson, P. J. (2016). Student-selected components in neurosurgery. Br J Neurosurg, 30(1), 4-6. doi:10.3109/02688697.2015.1114590

Collins, J. P., White, G. R., & Kennedy, J. A. (1995). Entry to medical school: an audit of traditional selection requirements. Med Educ, 29(1), 22-28. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1995.tb02795.x

Conijn, R., Snijders, C., Kleingeld, A., & Matzat, U. (2017). Predicting Student Performance from LMS Data: A Comparison of 17 Blended Courses Using Moodle LMS. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(1), 17-29. doi:10.1109/TLT.2016.2616312

Dickman, R. L., Sarnacki, R. E., Schimpfhauser, F. T., & Katz, L. A. (1980). Medical students from natural science and nonscience undergraduate backgrounds. Similar academic performance and residency selection. JAMA, 243(24), 2506-2509.

Dunleavy, D. M., Kroopnick, M. H., Dowd, K. W., Searcy, C. A., & Zhao, X. (2013). The predictive validity of the MCAT exam in relation to academic performance through medical school: a national cohort study of 2001-2004 matriculants. Acad Med, 88(5), 666-671. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182864299

Falk, G. A., Robb, W. B., Khan, W. H., & Hill, A. D. (2009). Student-selected components in surgery: providing practical experience and increasing student confidence. Ir J Med Sci, 178(3), 267-272. doi:10.1007/s11845-009-0306-8

Farhood, H., Joudah, I., Beheshti, A., & Müller, S. (2024). Evaluating and Enhancing Artificial Intelligence Models for Predicting Student Learning Outcomes. Informatics, 11, 46. doi:10.3390/informatics11030046

Garg, R. (2018). PREDICTING STUDENT PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT REGIONS OF PUNJAB USING CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUES. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 9, 236-240. doi:10.26483/ijarcs.v9i1.5234

Hoti, A. H., Zenuni, X., Hamiti, M., & Ajdari, J. (2023, 6-10 June 2023). Student Performance Prediction Using AI and ML: State of the Art. Paper presented at the 2023 12th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO).

Hussain, S., Muhsen, Z., Salal, Y., Theodorou, P., Kurtoğlu, F., & Hazarika, G. (2019). Prediction Model on Student Performance based on Internal Assessment using Deep Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14, 4. doi:10.3991/ijet.v14i08.10001

Khudhur, A., & Ramaha, N. T. A. (2023, 8-10 June 2023). Students' Performance Prediction Using Machine Learning Based on Generative Adversarial Network. Paper presented at the 2023 5th International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA).

Kleshinski, J., Khuder, S. A., Shapiro, J. I., & Gold, J. P. (2009). Impact of preadmission variables on USMLE step 1 and step 2 performance. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 14(1), 69-78. doi:10.1007/s10459-007-9087-x

Kreiter, C. D., & Kreiter, Y. (2007). A validity generalization perspective on the ability of undergraduate GPA and the medical college admission test to predict important outcomes. Teach Learn Med, 19(2), 95-100. doi:10.1080/10401330701332094

Mastour, H., Dehghani, T., Moradi, E., & Eslami, S. (2023). Early prediction of medical students' performance in high-stakes examinations using machine learning approaches. Heliyon, 9(7), e18248. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18248

Mesaric, J., & Šebalj, D. (2016). Decision trees for predicting the academic success of students. Croatian Operational Research Review, 7, 367-388. doi:10.17535/crorr.2016.0025

Mohamed, M. H., & Waguih, H. (2017). Early Prediction of Student Success Using a Data Mining Classification Technique.

Mueen, A., Zafar, B., & Manzoor, U. (2016). Modeling and Predicting Students' Academic Performance Using Data Mining Techniques. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 11, 36-42. doi:10.5815/ijmecs.2016.11.05

Ofori, F., Maina, E., & Gitonga, R. (2020). Using Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Students' Performance and Improve Learning Outcome: A Literature Based Review. 2616-3573.

Pallathadka, H., Wenda, A., Ramirez-Asís, E., Asis-Lopez, M., Flores-Albornoz, J., & Phasinam, K. (2021). Classification and prediction of student performance data using various machine learning algorithms. Materials Today: Proceedings, 80. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.382

Perez, E., Domínguez, J., Omatu, S., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Corchado Rodríguez, J. (2021). Machine Learning and Traditional Econometric Models: A Systematic Mapping Study. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research, 12, 79-100. doi:10.2478/jaiscr-2022-0006

Powers, D. (2008). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Factor to ROC, Informedness, Markedness & Correlation. Mach. Learn. Technol., 2.

Puddey, I. B., & Mercer, A. (2014). Predicting academic outcomes in an Australian graduate entry medical programme. BMC Med Educ, 14, 31. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-31

Putpuek, N., Rojanaprasert, N., Atchariyachanvanich, K., & Thamrongthanyawong, T. (2018). Comparative Study of Prediction Models for Final GPA Score: A Case Study of Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University.

Ramaswami, G. S., Susnjak, T., Mathrani, A., & Umer, R. (2020, 16-18 Dec. 2020). Predicting Students Final Academic Performance using Feature Selection Approaches. Paper presented at the 2020 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE).

Riley, S. C. (2009). Student Selected Components (SSCs): AMEE Guide No 46. Med Teach, 31(10), 885-894. doi:10.3109/01421590903261096

Singh, W., & Kaur, P. J. I. J. o. A. R. i. C. S. (2016). Comparative Analysis of Classification Techniques for Predicting Computer Engineering Students’ Academic Performance. 7.

Siu, E., & Reiter, H. I. (2009). Overview: what's worked and what hasn't as a guide towards predictive admissions tool development. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 14(5), 759-775. doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9160-8

Sivasakthi, M. (2017). Classification and prediction based data mining algorithms to predict students' introductory programming performance.

Sobral, D. T. (2008). Student-selected courses in a medical school: scope and relationships. Med Teach, 30(2), 199-205. doi:10.1080/01421590701754169

Thomas, S., Dhanoa, A., & Palanisamy, U. (2012). Shaping the Future of Medicine: The Effect of ‘Selective’ Choices on Tomorrow’s Doctors. Institutions and Economies.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-14

How to Cite

Tangpanithandee, S., Kitsiranuwat, S., Chantra, M., Puranitee, P., & Hongwarittorrn, N. (2025). COMPARATIVE STUDY IN PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS OF PERSONALIZED LEARNING AND TRADITIONAL CURRICULUM IN MEDICAL EDUCATION . Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, 11(01), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2025.11101