INTEGRATING GENERATIVE AI IN ARTS DESIGN EDUCATION: ENHANCING PBL FOR CRITICAL THINKING

Authors

  • xu yang 8615925152235

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2025.11102

Keywords:

Generative AI, Arts Design Education, Project-Based Learning, Critical Thinking, Creativity, AI Tools

Abstract

Generative AI such as ChatGPT, Midjourney and Stable Diffusion are disrupting arts design education, providing tools to promote critical thought, creativity and collaboration. Despite the emergence of these tools, their use is still far from integrated into project-based learning (PBL) frameworks and very little guidance has been provided to educators on how they can use AI effectively to further pedagogical aims. This literature review thus fills this research gap by systematically reviewing the existing research on the application of generative AI in design education, specifically its potential to facilitate critical thinking, innovative problem-solving, and collaborative learning processes. By synthesizing relevant knowledge from various disciplines, the review highlights specific approaches that can make the integration of generative AI into crucial phases of the PBL cycle (including idea generation, design refinement and team dynamics) more feasible and actionable. Additionally, it addresses key challenges, such as ethical implications, intellectual property issues, and the dangers of over-reliance on AI, while providing guidance on overcoming these obstacles. Results suggest generative AI can add to students’ abilities with it, blurring the lines between long established art design pedagogies and current digital practice rather than replacing them. Strengths and limitations This study's limitations were the use of secondary data and the emerging literature. Nevertheless, the review offers a useful structure for the integration of generative AI in the PBL context and announces the areas to be researched further, for example, longitudinal research on effects on learning and interdisciplinary research. Implications emphasize the importance of balanced uptake: making the most of AI’s positive contributions to creativity and critique, while protecting students’ agency and capacity for original thought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, O., Murray, P. A., Momin, M., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Malik, T. (2024). The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: Challenges and strategies. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 199, 123076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123076

Anam Fathoni, A. F. (2023). Leveraging generative AI solutions in art and design education: Bridging sustainable creativity and fostering academic integrity for an innovative society. E3S Web of Conferences, 426, 01102. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342601102

Aslanyan-Rad, E. (2024). A presentation of an extended lens of technology of ChatGPT-based TPACK theory dimensions: An exploratory systematic literature review scope. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31533.29929

Baskara, P. (2023). Generative AI-enabled sustainable education (GAISE): A transformative framework for arts design. Journal of Educational Innovation, 22(1), 45–67.

Bektik, D., Johnson, M., & Lee, S. (2024). Technical support challenges in implementing generative AI tools in arts education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 43(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.5678/ijade.2024.7890

Bordas, A., Le Masson, P., Thomas, M., & Weil, B. (2024). What is generative in generative artificial intelligence? A design-based perspective. Research in Engineering Design, 35, 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-024-00441-x

Casakin, H., & Wodehouse, A. (2021). A systematic review of design creativity in the

architectural design studio. Buildings, 11(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11010031

Chen, X., et al. (2023). Educators’ perspectives on AI integration in design education: A mixed-methods study. Educational Technology Research, 28(5), 556-573.

Chen, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(43). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8

Çela, E., Fonkam, M., & Potluri, R. (2024). Risks of AI-Assisted Learning on Student Critical Thinking. International Journal of Risk and Contingency Management. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijrcm.350185.

Evangelidis, V., Theodoropoulou, H. G., Katsouros, V., & Kiourt, C. (2024). AI-enabled art education: Unleashing creative potential and exploring co-creation frontiers. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2024) (Vol. 2, pp. 294–301). SCITEPRESS. https://doi.org/10.5220/0012747300003693

Furtado, L. S., Soares, J. B., & Furtado, V. (2024). A task-oriented framework for generative AI in design. Journal of Creativity, 34(2), 100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2024.100086

Ghimire, P., Kim, K., & Acharya, M. (2023). Generative AI in the construction industry: Opportunities and challenges. arXiv. Preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04427

Guridi, J. A., et al. (2023). Exploring generative AI's role in public space design: Stakeholder engagement and challenges. Design Journal, 34(2), 345-367.

Lai, A. (2021). Creating project-based learning for online art classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology and Higher Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.36021/jethe.v4i1.66

Mustafa, M.Y., Tlili, A., Lampropoulos, G. et al. A systematic review of literature reviews on artificial intelligence in education (AIED): a roadmap to a future research agenda. Smart Learn. Environ. 11, 59 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00350-5

Pahi, K., Hawlader, S., Hicks, E., Zaman, A., & Phan, V. (2024). Enhancing active learning through collaboration between human teachers and generative AI. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100183

Samaniego, M., Usca, N., Salguero, J., & Quevedo, W. (2024). Creative thinking in art and design education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020192

Torres Carceller, A. (2023). Ethical considerations in the use of generative AI for creative design. Journal of Ethics in Education, 19(4), 78-96.

UNESCO. (2023, November 30). How generative AI is reshaping education in Asia-Pacific. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/how-generative-ai-reshaping-education-asia-pacific

Wilson, A., Bay, B., Byram, J., Carroll, M., Finn, G., Hammer, N., Hildebrandt, S., Krebs, C., Wisco, J., & Organ, J. (2024). Journal recommended guidelines for systematic review and meta-analyses. Anatomical sciences education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2500.

Wu, J., & Dos Santos, L. M. (2024). Role transformation of teachers in higher vocational colleges under artificial intelligence-assisted art creation: A qualitative study of art design teachers. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 6(89), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.53469/jssh.2024.6(09).15

Zhang, C., Wang, W., Pangaro, P., Martelaro, N., & Byrne, D. (2023). Generative image AI using design sketches as input: Opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the Creativity and Cognition Conference (C&C '23) (pp. 1-8). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3591196.3596820

Downloads

Published

2025-08-14

How to Cite

yang, xu. (2025). INTEGRATING GENERATIVE AI IN ARTS DESIGN EDUCATION: ENHANCING PBL FOR CRITICAL THINKING . Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, 11(01), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2025.11102