STRATEGIES OF SELF-REGULATED LEARNING CALCULUS 1
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17501.26307413.2024.7101Keywords:
SRL strategies, learning calculus, digital technology, Calculus 1, qualitative research, online learningAbstract
University students have adopted various strategies to learn Calculus 1, especially during the pandemic era when digital technology became integral to their learning processes. This study aims to explore how university students leverage digital technology to engage in self-regulated learning (SRL) while studying Calculus 1. A qualitative research approach was employed, focusing on university students who completed the course through online learning. Six participants were interviewed to gather insights into their use of digital tools for learning regulation. The findings reveal that communication tools such as WhatsApp, Microsoft Teams Chat, and email are commonly used by students to seek social support, share information, and keep each other informed about schedules, assignments, and assessments. Online conference platforms, such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams, are employed for group discussions, particularly to clarify concepts and address doubts about complex topics. Students also regulate their learning by organizing and compiling study materials through online storage services like Google Drive. This allows them to access their resources efficiently and maintain a structured approach to studying. Furthermore, students utilize open resource technologies such as Desmos, GeoGebra, and online scientific calculators to validate their answers and visualize mathematical concepts. These tools help students deepen their understanding of Calculus 1 by enabling interactive exploration and immediate feedback. This study underscores the significance of digital technology in facilitating SRL among university students. By effectively incorporating digital tools into their learning strategies, students can adapt to online learning environments and enhance their engagement with challenging subjects like Calculus 1.
Downloads
References
Akintolu, M., Letseka, M., Olugbara, C.T. (2023). Elearning readiness of facilitators and learners in adult literacy programmes: a mied method enquiry. Journal of Educators Online, 20 (3)
Bitter, G., and Legacy, J. (2007). Using Technology in the Classroom (7th Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
Ganan, D., Caballe, S., Conesa, J., Barolli, L., Kulla, E., & Spaho, E. (2014). A systematic review of multimedia resources to support teaching and learning in virtual environments. 2014 Eighth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/cisis.2014.35
Gay, L.R., Mills, GE., & Airasian. P. (2006). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
He, D., Wu, D., Yue, Z., Fu, A., & Thien Vo, K. (2012, November). Undergraduate students' interaction with online information resources in their academic tasks: A comparative study. In Aslib Proceedings (Vol. 64, No. 6, pp. 615-640). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Johnson, G. and Davies, S. (2014). Self-regulated learning in digital environments: theory, research, praxis. British Journal of Research. 1 (2): pp. 1-14.
Karabenick, S. A., & Dembo, M. H. (2011). Understanding and facilitating self-regulated help seeking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (126), 33–43. doi: 10.1002/tl.442
Karakırık, E. (2016). Developing virtual mathematics manipulatives: the SAMAP project. International perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics with virtual manipulatives, 147-170.
Kennedy, G., Judd, T., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108-122. Retrieved from: http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet.html
Mirriahi, N., & Alonzo, D. (2015). Shedding light on students’ technology preferences: Implications for academic development. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 12(1), 1–14.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational psychology review, 16, 385-407.
Rapport, F. (2010) Summative Analysis: A qualitative method for social science and health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9 (3), 270 – 290
Siregar, R. N., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, S., & Mujib, A. (2022). Students’ Self-Regulated in Learning Mathematics using Realistic Mathematical Education Model. (JIML) Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 5(4), 183-195.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. doi:10.3102/ 0002831207312909.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2009). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement, Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 1–38). New York: Routledge.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mahandari NKAI , Argaswari DPAD

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.