A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HAND DIMENSIONS BETWEEN THAI AND OTHER POPULATIONS BY GENDER: A LITERATURE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17501/24246735.2025.10103Keywords:
hand dimensions, gender, ergonomics, Thai populationAbstract
Hand anthropometric data are critical for designing hand-operated tools and devices that appropriately fit human hand dimensions. Well-fitted tools improve usability, comfort, and safety while reducing the risk of hand-related musculoskeletal disorders. A key ergonomic design factor is the anatomical difference between male and female hands, which affects grip strength, reach, and tool interaction. This study conducted a structured literature review to synthesize gender-based differences in hand anthropometry among the Thai population and compare them with international findings. Articles were retrieved using the keywords “Hand Anthropometry” and “Hand Anthropometry AND Thai” from six academic databases: Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Google Scholar, and TCI. The selection process involved six exclusion steps. First, duplicates and non-anthropometric topics were removed (4 articles). Second, studies unrelated to hand dimensions were excluded (27 articles). Third, studies with fewer than five participants or overly technical focus were excluded (2 articles). Fourth, studies not reporting participant nationality were removed (50 articles). Fifth, studies involving clinical populations or robotics were excluded (12 articles). Sixth, articles lacking sex-disaggregated data or full-text access were removed (12 articles). In total, 45 articles met the inclusion criteria. The analysis showed that Thai males had hand dimensions 3.36–13.42% larger than females, with the most significant differences (over 10%) in hand width. Compared to international studies, hand length in the Thai population demonstrated a greater gender-based gap. These findings emphasize the need to integrate sex-specific anthropometric data in ergonomic design. A nationwide anthropometric survey using standardized digital tools is recommended to support inclusive product development and safety standards in Thailand.
References
Courtney, A. J. (1984). Hand anthropometry of hong kong chinese females compared to other ethnic groups. Ergonomics, 27(11), 1169–1180. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138408963598
de Souza, F. G., & Kunkel, M. E. (2022). Estimation of stature from hand and handprint dimensions in the Brazilian population. Research on Biomedical Engineering, 38(2), 571–579. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-022-00209-z
Imrhan, S. N., Sarder, M. D., & Mandahawi, N. (2009). Hand anthropometry in Bangladeshis living in America and comparisons with other populations. Ergonomics, 52(8), 987–998. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130902792478
Ishak, N.-I., Hemy, N., & Franklin, D. (2012). Estimation of sex from hand and handprint dimensions in a Western Australian population. Forensic Science International, 221(1–3), 154.e1-154.e6. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.04.017
Jee, S.-C., Bahn, S., & Yun, M. H. (2015). Determination of sex from various hand dimensions of Koreans. Forensic Science International, 257, 521.e1-521.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.10.014
Jee, S.-C., & Yun, M. H. (2015). Estimation of stature from diversified hand anthropometric dimensions from Korean population. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 35, 9–14. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.06.014
Kaewdok, T., Norkaew, S., Sirisawasd, S., Choochouy, N., & Taptagaporn, S. (2022). Anthropometric Measurement of Thai Older Farmers for Agricultural Tools and Workplace Design. Designs, 6(5), 1–14. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs6050081
Mandahawi, N., Imrhan, S., Al-Shobaki, S., & Sarder, B. (2008). Hand anthropometry survey for the Jordanian population. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(11–12), 966–976. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.010
Nag, A., Nag, P. K., & Desai, H. (2003). Hand anthropometry of Indian women. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 117, 260–269. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14748472
Okunribido, O. O. (2000). A survey of hand anthropometry of female rural farm workers in ibadan, western nigeria. Ergonomics, 43(2), 282–292. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300184611
Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Martínez Buelvas, L., Hernández, J., & Escobar, J. (2017). Hand anthropometric study in northern Colombia. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics: JOSE, 23(4), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2016.1217653
Sadeghi, F., Mazloumi, A., & Kazemi, Z. (2015). An anthropometric data bank for the Iranian working population with ethnic diversity. Applied Ergonomics, 48, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.009
Saengchaiya, N., & Bunterngchit, Y. (2004). Hand anthropometry of Thai female industrial workers. The Journal of KMITNB, 14(1), 16–19. https://www.thaiscience.info/journals/Article/TJKM/10470204.pdf
Seifert, E., Curry, C., & Griffin, L. (2019). 3D Anthropometric Assessment of Functional Hand Grasps for Surgeons and Medical Professionals. V001T08A002. https://doi.org/10.1115/DMD2019-3310
Shahriar, M. M., Parvez, M. S., & Lutfi, M. (2020). A survey of hand anthropometry of Bangladeshi agricultural farm workers. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 78, 1–14. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102978
Talapatra, S., & Mohsin, N. (2021). Analysis of hand anthropometry of the people of different nations working in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the First Central American and Caribbean International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Port-au-Prince, Haiti, June 15-16, 2021, 108-114. https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2021haiti/225.pdf
Sinlapasat, P. (2015). Hand and foot anthropometry and range of motion in the elderly [Master’s thesis, Suranaree University of Technology, School of Engineering, Industrial Engineering Program]. SUT Institutional Repository. http://sutir.sut.ac.th:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6090
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mr. Jakkapong Inporn, Assoc. Prof. Klngduen Pochana, Assoc. Prof. Supapan Chaiprapat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Conference Proceedings of International Conference on Public Health is entirely Open Access, which means that all published content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this Proceedings journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Authors who publish with Conference Proceedings agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Proceedings of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this conference proceedings.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the proceeding's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this conference proceedings.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing
Published articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
