THE VANISHED FACE UNDER THE DEATH PENALTY SYSTEM: SEEING THE FACE OF THE OTHER THROUGH ART

Authors

  • YU HENG CHOU Faculty of Fine and Applied Arts, Chulalongkorn University
  • Haisang Javanalikhikara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/23572744.2025.12103

Keywords:

death penalty, mass psychology, performance art, alterity, desire

Abstract

This paper will study the persistent public support for capital punishment in Taiwan and explore how it serves as a symbolic social ritual closely linked to the mass psychology, desires and fantasies. A few famous works of research have been cited in this paper, including Foucault's idea of biopolitics, Agamben's theory of the state of exception, Butler's theory of subject formation, and Lacanian/Žižekian theories on desire and fantasy. This paper studies the idea that capital punishment is not only a type of legal punishment but also a way to perform rituals and create a scene to meet deep-seated psychological needs. These symbolic performances reinforce social order but deterring ethical reflection. Thus, the fantasy of justice endures and engagement with the deeper causes of punitive desires is thus avoided. Building on Levinas's idea of the "face of the Other", this paper proposes performance art to intervene in ethical perception by means of embodied alterity. Performance-based artistic analysis is used to explore how the body, alterity, susceptibility and repetition can achieve consciousness states outside of oneself, disrupt normative frames, uncover complicity in punitive rituals, and develop ethically responsible encounters. Rather than substituting one fantasy (punitive justice) with another (ideal abolitionism) through art, this study proposes tense, reflective spaces that reveal the subject's inner divisions and the many, often contradictory, senses of self. Thus, fixed ideas of the self can be dismantled, and the community can be led to confront its own complicities and shared vulnerabilities. The community in this view is not guaranteed by the state or moral ideals. Rather, it is based on an acceptance of the state of lack of being and a fragile relationship with others.

References

Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.

Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. University of Chicago Press.

Alexander, J.C. (2004). Cultural pragmatics: social performance between ritual and strategy. Sociological Theory, 22(4), 527–573.

Aristotle, & Butcher, S. H. (1961). Aristotle’s poetics. (S. H. Butcher, Trans.). Hill and Wang.

Badinter, R. (2008). Abolition: one man’s battle against the death penalty ([English ed.]). Northeastern University Press; University Press of New England.

Beccaria, C., & Voltaire, 1. (2011). An essay on crimes and punishments. (New ed., corr.). W.C. Little. (Original work published 1872)

Butler, J. (1987). Subjects of desire: Hegelian reflections in Twentieth century France. Columbia University Press.

Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford University Press.

Butler, J. (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.

Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself. Fordham University Press.

Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable? Verso.

Butler, J. (2015). Senses of the subject. Fordham University Press.

Cavarero, A. (2000). Relating narratives: Storytelling and selfhood. Routledge.

Chang, W.-P. (2017). Reflections on the abolition or retention of the death penalty in Taiwan in light of random killing incidents from 2009 to 2016. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 11(1), 33–61.

Chiu, C.-Y. (2015). The orientation of media manipulation and its impact on the abolition of the death penalty: The case of the Cheng Chieh incident. Taiwan Human Rights Journal, 3(1), 147–156.

Ellsworth, P. C., & Gross, S. R. (1994). Hardening of the attitudes: Americans' views on the death penalty. Journal of Social Issues, 50(2), 19-52.

Fischer-Lichte, E. (2008). The transformative power of performance: A new aesthetics (S. Jain, Trans.). Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punishment: The birth of the prison. Random House.

Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Palgrave Macmillan.

Freud, S. (1924). The economic problem of masochism. London: Hogarth Press

Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. SE

Freud, S., & Bunker, H. A. (1960). Psychopathic characters on the stage. The Tulane Drama Review, 4(3), 144–148.

Hancock, B. H., & Garner, R. (2011). Towards a Philosophy of Containment: Reading Goffman in the 21st Century. The American Sociologist, 42(4), 316-340.

Hugo, V. (2012). The last day of a condemned man. Courier Corporation. (Original work published 1829)

Jou, S., & Hebenton, B. (2020). Support for the death penalty in Taiwan? A study of value conflict and ambivalence. Asian Journal of Criminology, 15(2), 157–175.

Lacan, J. (1977). Écrits: a selection. (A. Sheridan, Trans.) W. W. Norton & Company.

Lacan, J. (1981). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book XI, Four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis (J.-A. Miller, Ed.; A. Sheridan, Trans.). W.W. Norton & Company.

Lacan, J. (1992). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book VII: The ethics of psychoanalysis. (J.-A. Miller, Ed.; D. Porter, Trans.). W. W. Norton & Company.

Levinas, E., & Lingis, A. (1978). Existence and existents. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

Levinas, E. (1979). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media.

Nietzsche, F. (1967), On the genealogy of morals and ecce homo. (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Vintage.

Pratt, J. (2007). Penal populism. Routledge.

Till, B., & Vitouch, P. (2012). Capital punishment in films: The impact of death penalty portrayals on viewers’ mood and attitude toward capital punishment. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(3), 387–399.

Zaroulia, M. (2018). Performing that which exceeds us: Aesthetics of sincerity and obscenity during ‘the refugee crisis’. Performance Research, 23(4), 14–22.

Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. Verso.

Žižek, S. (1992). Enjoy your symptom! Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and out. Routledge.

Žižek, S. (1999). The ticklish subject: the absent centre of political ontology. Verso.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

THE VANISHED FACE UNDER THE DEATH PENALTY SYSTEM: SEEING THE FACE OF THE OTHER THROUGH ART. (2026). Proceeding of the International Conference on Arts and Humanities, 12(01), 30-42. https://doi.org/10.17501/23572744.2025.12103