ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF CYP2C19 GENOTYPE-GUIDED ANTIPLATELET THERAPY FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Authors

  • Chau H. Lam Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Thailand
  • Anh N. T. Vuong Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Thailand
  • Assoc.Prof. Dr. Usa Chaikledkaew Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Thailand , Mahidol University Health Technology Assessment (MUHTA) Graduate Program, Mahidol University, Thailand
  • Asst. Prof. Dr. Saowalak Turongkaravee Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17501/26138417.2026.9102

Keywords:

coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, CYP2C19 testing, clopidogrel, economic evaluation, systematic review

Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel is essential for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, but clopidogrel’s effectiveness varies due to CYP2C19 genetic differences. This is critical in Asian populations, where CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles are nearly twice as prevalent as in Caucasians, increasing thrombotic risk. Alternatives such as ticagrelor and prasugrel are more effective, but costlier with higher bleeding risks, making CYP2C19 genotype-guided therapy a potentially efficient approach. This study updates systematic reviews of economic evaluations of CYP2C19 genotyping in coronary artery disease patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to inform policy and clinical decisions. PubMed and Scopus were searched through October 2025 for full economic evaluations. Non-English or inaccessible full-text studies were excluded. Reporting and evidence quality were assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 Checklist and the Cooper hierarchy. Due to heterogeneity, results were synthesized narratively. Twenty-two studies from nine countries were included, with most conducted in high-income settings. Across extracted base-case comparisons, genotype-guided strategies were generally cost-effective or cost-saving when compared with universal clopidogrel or universal prasugrel, while results were less favorable when compared with universal ticagrelor. Key drivers of cost-effectiveness were drug prices, clinical event risks, and allele prevalence, whereas testing costs were less frequently influential. Evidence from lower-income countries was limited and results varied with local costs, testing availability, and treatment pathways. Overall, genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy appears economically favorable in many settings, but decisions should be context-specific, particularly in Asian settings with high CYP2C19 loss-of-function burden.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AlMukdad, S., Elewa, H., & Al-Badriyeh, D. (2020). Economic evaluations of CYP2C19 genotype- guided antiplatelet therapy compared to the universal use of antiplatelets in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 25(3), 201-211. doi:10.1177/1074248420902298

AlMukdad, S., Elewa, H., Arafa, S., & Al-Badriyeh, D. (2021). Short- and long-term cost-effectiveness analysis of CYP2C19 genotype-guided therapy, universal clopidogrel, versus universal ticagrelor in post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients in Qatar. International Journal of Cardiology, 331, 27-34. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.01.044

Biswas, M., & Kali, S. K. (2021). Association of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles with major adverse cardiovascular events of clopidogrel in stable coronary artery disease patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Meta-analysis. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 35(6), 1147-1159. doi:10.1007/s10557-021-07142-w

Borse, M. S., Dong, O. M., Polasek, M. J., Farley, J. F., Stouffer, G. A., & Lee, C. R. (2017). CYP2C19- guided antiplatelet therapy: A cost-effectiveness analysis of 30-day and 1-year outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention. Pharmacogenomics, 18(12), 1155-1166. doi:10.2217/pgs-2017-0075

Claassens, D. M. F., van Dorst, P. W. M., Vos, G. J. A., Bergmeijer, T. O., Hermanides, R. S., van 't Hof, A. W. J., . . . Boersma, C. (2022). Cost effectiveness of a CYP2C19 genotype-guided strategy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results from the POPular Genetics trial. American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 22(2), 195-206. doi:10.1007/s40256-021-00496- 4

Cooper, N., Coyle, D., Abrams, K., Mugford, M., & Sutton, A. (2005). Use of evidence in decision models: an appraisal of health technology assessments in the UK since 1997. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(4), 245-250. doi:10.1258/135581905774414187

Deiman, B. A., Tonino, P. A., Kouhestani, K., Schrover, C. E., Scharnhorst, V., Dekker, L. R., & Pijls, N. H. (2016). Reduced number of cardiovascular events and increased cost-effectiveness by genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions in the Netherlands. Netherlands Heart Journal, 24(10), 589-599. doi:10.1007/s12471-016-0873-z

Dong, O. M., Friede, K. A., Chanfreau-Coffinier, C., & Voora, D. (2023). Cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitors in Veterans undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes. European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, 9(3), 249-257. doi:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac031

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2017). FDA Drug Safety Communication: Reduced effectiveness of Plavix (clopidogrel) in patients who are poor metabolizers of the drug. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/fda- drug-safety-communication-reduced-effectiveness-plavix-clopidogrel-patients-who-are-poor

Fragoulakis, V., Bartsakoulia, M., Díaz-Villamarín, X., Chalikiopoulou, K., Kehagia, K., Ramos, J. G. S., . . . Mitropoulou, C. (2019). Cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmacogenomics-guided clopidogrel treatment in Spanish patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The Pharmacogenomics Journal, 19(5), 438-445. doi:10.1038/s41397-019-0069-1

Fu, Y., Zhang, X. Y., Qin, S. B., Nie, X. Y., Shi, L. W., Shao, H., & Liu, J. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19 LOF-guided antiplatelet therapy in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome. Pharmacogenomics, 21(1), 33-42. doi:10.2217/pgs-2019-0050

Gower, M. N., Ratner, L. R., Williams, A. K., Rossi, J. S., Stouffer, G. A., & Lee, C. R. (2020). Clinical utility of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients at risk of adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events: A review of emerging evidence. Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, 13, 239-252. doi:10.2147/pgpm.S231475

Huang, C. L., Tsao, T. P., Yin, W. H., Huang, W. B., Jen, H. L., Lin, C. C., . . . Hsu, C. H. (2024). Comprehensive comparative efficacy and safety of potent P2Y(12) inhibitors in patients undergoing coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Cardiology: Heart & Vasculature, 51, 101359. doi:10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101359

Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Augustovski, F., de Bekker-Grob, E., Briggs, A. H., Carswell, C., . . . Staniszewska, S. (2022). Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: Updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. Value in Health, 25(1), 3-9. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1351

Jiang, M., & You, J. H. (2015). CYP2C19 genotype plus platelet reactivity-guided antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients: A decision analysis. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, 25(12), 609-617. doi:10.1097/fpc.0000000000000177

Jiang, M., & You, J. H. (2016). Cost-effectiveness analysis of personalized antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Pharmacogenomics, 17(7), 701-713. doi:10.2217/pgs- 2016-0008

Jiang, M., & You, J. H. (2017). CYP2C19 LOF and GOF-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 31(1), 39-49. doi:10.1007/s10557-016-6705-y

Kazi, D. S., Garber, A. M., Shah, R. U., Dudley, R. A., Mell, M. W., Rhee, C., . . . Hlatky, M. A. (2014). Cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided and dual antiplatelet therapies in acute coronary syndrome. Annals of Internal Medicine, 160(4), 221-232. doi:10.7326/m13-1999

Kim, J. H., Tan, D. S., & Chan, M. Y. Y. (2021). Cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndromes in Singapore. The Pharmacogenomics Journal, 21(2), 243-250. doi:10.1038/s41397-020-00204-6

Kim, K., Touchette, D. R., Cavallari, L. H., Ardati, A. K., & DiDomenico, R. J. (2019). Cost- effectiveness of strategies to personalize the selection of P2Y(12) inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 33(5), 533-546. doi:10.1007/s10557-019-06896-8

Lala, A., Berger, J. S., Sharma, G., Hochman, J. S., Scott Braithwaite, R., & Ladapo, J. A. (2013). Genetic testing in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 11(1), 81- 91. doi:10.1111/jth.12059

Levine, G. N., Bates, E. R., Bittl, J. A., Brindis, R. G., Fihn, S. D., Fleisher, L. A., . . . Smith, S. C., Jr. (2016). 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines: An update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention, 2011ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation, 134(10), e123-155. doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000404

Lim, K. K., Koleva-Kolarova, R., Kamaruzaman, H. F., Kamil, A. A., Chowienczyk, P., Wolfe, C. D. A., & Fox-Rushby, J. (2024). Genetic-guided pharmacotherapy for coronary artery disease: A systematic and critical review of economic evaluations. Journal of the American Heart Association, 13(5), e030058. doi:10.1161/jaha.123.030058

Limdi, N. A., Cavallari, L. H., Lee, C. R., Hillegass, W. B., Holmes, A. M., Skaar, T. C., . . . Peterson, J. F. (2020). Cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention informed by real-world data. The Pharmacogenomics Journal, 20(5), 724-735. doi:10.1038/s41397-020-0162-5

Lyu, S. Q., Yang, Y. M., Zhu, J., Wang, J., Wu, S., Zhang, H., . . . Ren, J. M. (2020). The efficacy and safety of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy compared with conventional antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Platelets, 31(8), 971- 980. doi:10.1080/09537104.2020.1780205

Okere, A. N., Ezendu, K., Berthe, A., & Diaby, V. (2018). An evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of comprehensive MTM integrated with point-of-care phenotypic and genetic testing for U.S. elderly patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. Journal of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy, 24(2), 142-152. doi:10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.142

Patel, V., Lin, F. J., Ojo, O., Rao, S., Yu, S., Zhan, L., & Touchette, D. R. (2014). Cost-utility analysis of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with moderate-to-high risk acute coronary syndrome and planned percutaneous coronary intervention. Pharmacy Practice (Granada), 12(3), 438. doi:10.4321/s1886-36552014000300007

Reese, E. S., Daniel Mullins, C., Beitelshees, A. L., & Onukwugha, E. (2012). Cost-effectiveness of cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype screening for selection of antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or prasugrel. Pharmacotherapy, 32(4), 323-332. doi:10.1002/j.1875- 9114.2012.01048

Shakya, S., Shrestha, A., Robinson, S., Randall, S., Mnatzaganian, G., Brown, H., . . . Gao, L. (2025). Global comparison of the economic costs of coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 15(1), e084917. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084917

Sorich, M. J., Horowitz, J. D., Sorich, W., Wiese, M. D., Pekarsky, B., & Karnon, J. D. (2013). Cost- effectiveness of using CYP2C19 genotype to guide selection of clopidogrel or ticagrelor in Australia. Pharmacogenomics, 14(16), 2013-2021. doi:10.2217/pgs.13.164

Suh, H., Lee, I.-H., Lee, S., & Kang, H.-Y. (2024). Cost-effectiveness analysis of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Korea. Drug Targets and Therapeutics, 3, 51-61. doi:10.58502/DTT.23.0026

van den Broek, W. W. A., Azzahhafi, J., Chan Pin Yin, D., van der Sangen, N. M. R., Sivanesan, S., Dijksman, L. M., . . . Ten Berg, J. M. (2025). Cost-effectiveness of implementing a genotype-

guided de-escalation strategy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. European Heart

Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy, 11(3), 230-240. doi:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae087

Wang, Y., Yan, B. P., Liew, D., & Lee, V. W. Y. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of cytochrome P450 2C19 *2 genotype-guided selection of clopidogrel or ticagrelor in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome. The Pharmacogenomics Journal, 18(1), 113-120. doi:10.1038/tpj.2016.94

WHO. (2025). Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact- sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)

Zhu, Y., Swanson, K. M., Rojas, R. L., Wang, Z., St Sauver, J. L., Visscher, S. L., . . . Borah, B. J. (2020). Systematic review of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics- guided treatment for cardiovascular diseases. Genetics in Medicine, 22(3), 475-486. doi:10.1038/s41436-019-0667-y

Downloads

Published

2026-06-16

How to Cite

ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF CYP2C19 GENOTYPE-GUIDED ANTIPLATELET THERAPY FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. (2026). Proceedings of the Global Public Health Conference, 9(01), 14-30. https://doi.org/10.17501/26138417.2026.9102