COMPARATIVE CUMULATIVE ENERGY DEMAND ANALYSIS OF TALL SPINDLE AND GUYOT TRAINING SYSTEMS IN MOUNTAIN APPLE PRODUCTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17501/26827018.2025.10101Keywords:
Cumulative energy demand (CED), apple cultivation, tree architecture, mountain agricultureAbstract
In modern apple cultivation, the choice of orchard training system is a critical factor that directly influences yield, fruit quality, resource efficiency, and energy performance, especially in mountainous regions, where topographic constraints increase operational intensity. This study evaluated the energy performance of two orchard training systems in the mountainous region of Northern Italy: the conventional Tall Spindle (TS) and innovative Guyot (GS) systems. Using the Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) framework, the analysis quantified primary energy intensity across a "cradle-to-farm-gate" system boundary, with all inputs normalized to a functional unit of 1 kg of fresh apples. The results show that the Guyot system reduces the total cumulative energy demand by 22.9%, from 1.44 MJ kg−1 for TS to 1.11 MJ kg−1 for GS. This reduction stems primarily from decreased electricity use (-49.5%) and lower energy embodied in machinery (-66.9%) due to the narrow canopy, which minimizes the need for elevated harvesting platforms. However, GS requires greater embodied energy in the trellis infrastructure (+18.4%) owing to its narrow- row design. Despite these gains, both systems remain heavily reliant on non-renewable fossil sources, which account for over 93% of the total demand, with diesel and fertilizers as persistent energy hotspots. The study concluded that architectural redesign toward simplified narrow-canopy structures is a primary lever for improving energy efficiency in mountain orchards, enabling significant energy savings without compromising yield. Therefore, future research and implementation should focus on integrating architectural innovation with precision input management and renewable energy adoption to further enhance resource efficiency and advance sustainable intensification in mountain agriculture.
References
Bortolotti, G., Perulli, G., Boini, A., Bresilla, K., Bonora, A., Venturi, M., & Manfrini, L. (2022). Individual upright physiological traits in an apple “Guyot” training system. Acta Horticulturae, 1346, 353–358. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2022.1346.44
Canaj, K., & Mehmeti, A. (2024). Energy Consumption and Environmental Impacts in Western Balkan Apple Production: A Case Study of the Korça Province, Albania. Applied Fruit Science, 66(2), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-024-01044-5
Dorigoni, A. (2016). Innovative fruit tree architecture as a nexus to improve sustainability in orchards. Acta Horticulturae, 1137, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1137.1
Dorigoni, A., & Micheli, F. (2019). Development of a cultivation system for multi-leader trees.
Gökdoğan, O., & Uysal, Ö. (2024). Determination of Energy Utilization Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission in Apple Production: Case of Isparta. Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences, 2. https://doi.org/10.15316/SJAFS.2024.020
Huijbregts, M. A. J., Hellweg, S., Frischknecht, R., Hendriks, H. W. M., Hungerbühler, K., & Hendriks, A. J. (2010). Cumulative Energy Demand As Predictor for the Environmental Burden of Commodity Production. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(6), 2189–2196. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902870s
Lordan, J., Francescatto, P., Dominguez, L. I., & Robinson, T. L. (2018). Long-term effects of tree density and tree shape on apple orchard performance, a 20 year study—Part 1, agronomic analysis. Scientia Horticulturae, 238, 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.04.033
Majumdar, S., & McLaren, S. J. (2024). Towards use of life cycle–based indicators to support continuous improvement in the environmental performance of avocado orchards in New Zealand. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 29(2), 192–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02238-x
Molaee Jafrodi, H., Gholami Parashkoohi, M., Afshari, H., & Mohammad Zamani, D. (2022). Comparative life cycle cost-energy and cumulative exergy demand of paddy production under different cultivation scenarios: A case study. Ecological Indicators, 144, 109507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109507
Paris, B., Vandorou, F., Balafoutis, A. T., Vaiopoulos, K., Kyriakarakos, G., Manolakos, D., & Papadakis, G. (2022). Energy use in open-field agriculture in the EU: A critical review recommending energy efficiency measures and renewable energy sources adoption. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, 112098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112098
Scalisi, A., O’Connell, M. G., Stefanelli, D., Zhou, S., Pitt, T., Graetz, D., Dodds, K., Han, L., De Bei, R., Stanley, J., Breen, K., & Goodwin, I. (2024). Narrow orchard systems for pome and stone
fruit—A review. Scientia Horticulturae, 338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113815
113815.
Vinyes, E., Asin, L., Alegre, S., Gasol, C. M., & Muñoz, P. (2018). Carbon footprint and profitability of two apple cultivation training systems: Central axis and Fruiting wall. Scientia Horticulturae, 229, 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.10.046
Waleed Fouad, A. (2021). Intensive fruit orchards cultivation. Journal of Plant Science and Phytopathology, 5(3), 072–075. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001064
Yan, X., Ye, D., Tang, Y., Muneer, M. A., Christie, P., Tou, C., Xu, W., Shen, B., Xu, J., & Zhang, J. (2023). Potential mitigation of environmental impacts of intensive plum production in southeast China with maintenance of high yields: Evaluation using life cycle assessment. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1158591. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1158591
Zoli, M., & Bacenetti, J. (2025). Energy analysis in fish aquaculture: Cumulative energy demand of
different farming systems. Aquacultural Engineering, 110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2025.102525
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Proceedings of the International Conference on Agriculture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
